Julius Caesar (play)
The
Tragedy of Julius Caesar (First
Folio title: The Tragedie of Ivlivs
Cæsar) is a history play and tragedy
by William Shakespeare
first performed in 1599. It is one of several plays written by Shakespeare
based on true events from Roman
history, such as Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra.
Set
in Rome
in 44 BC, the play depicts the moral dilemma of Brutus
as he joins a conspiracy led by Cassius
to murder Julius Caesar
to prevent him from becoming dictator of Rome. Following Caesar's death, Rome
is thrust into a period of civil war, and the republic the conspirators sought
to preserve is lost forever.
Although
the play is named Julius Caesar, Brutus speaks more than four times as
many lines as the title character; and the central psychological drama of the
play focuses on Brutus' struggle between the conflicting demands of honour, patriotism,
and friendship.
Characters
Conspirators
against Caesar
Tribunes
Roman
Senate Senators
- Cicero
- Publius
- Popilius Lena
Citizens
- Calpurnia – Caesar's wife
- Portia – Brutus' wife
- Soothsayer – a person supposed to be able to foresee the future
- Artemidorus – sophist from Knidos
- Cinna – poet
- Cobbler
- Carpenter
- Poet (believed to be based on Marcus Favonios)
- Lucius – Brutus' attendant
Loyal
to Brutus and Cassius
- Volumnius
- Titinius
- Young Cato – Portia's brother
- Messala – messenger
- Varrus
- Clitus
- Claudius
- Dardanius
- Strato
- Lucilius
- Flavius (non-speaking role)
- Labeo (non-speaking role)
- Pindarus – Cassius' bondman
Other
- Caesar's servant
- Antony's servant
- Octavius' servant
- Messenger
- Other soldiers, senators, plebeians, and attendants
Synopsis
Julius Caesar
The
play opens with two tribunes
discovering the commoners
of Rome celebrating Julius Caesar's
triumphant return
from defeating
the sons of his military rival, Pompey. The tribunes, insulting the crowd for their change in
loyalty from Pompey to Caesar, attempt to end the festivities and break up the
commoners, who return the insults. During the feast
of Lupercal, Caesar holds a victory parade and
a soothsayer
warns him to "Beware the
ides of March", which he ignores. Meanwhile,
Cassius
attempts to convince Brutus to join his conspiracy to kill Caesar. Although Brutus, friendly towards Caesar,
is hesitant to kill him, he agrees that Caesar may be abusing his power. They
then hear from Casca
that Mark Antony
has offered Caesar the crown of Rome three times and that each time Caesar
refused it with increasing reluctance, in hopes that the crowd watching the
exchange would beg him to accept the crown, yet the crowd applauded Caesar for
denying the crown, upsetting Caesar, due to his wanting to accept the crown. On
the eve of the ides of March, the conspirators meet and reveal that they have forged
letters of support from the Roman people to tempt Brutus into joining. Brutus
reads the letters and, after much moral debate, decides to join the conspiracy,
thinking that Caesar should be killed to prevent him from doing anything
against the people of Rome if he were ever to be crowned.
After
ignoring the soothsayer, as well as his wife Calpurnia's own premonitions, Caesar goes to the Senate. The
conspirators approach him with a fake petition pleading on behalf of Metellus
Cimber's banished brother. As Caesar
predictably rejects the petition, Casca and the others suddenly stab him;
Brutus is last. At this point, Caesar utters the famous line "Et
tu, Brute?" ("And you,
Brutus?", i.e. "You too, Brutus?"), concluding with
"Then fall, Caesar!"
The
conspirators make clear that they committed this murder for the good of Rome,
not for their own purposes, and do not attempt to flee the scene. Brutus
delivers an oration defending his own actions, and for the moment, the crowd is
on his side. However, Mark Antony makes a subtle and eloquent speech over
Caesar's corpse, beginning with the much-quoted "Friends, Romans,
countrymen, lend me your ears!"
In this way, he deftly turns public
opinion against the assassins by
manipulating the emotions of the common
people, in contrast to the rational tone
of Brutus's speech, yet there is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures:
he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the
poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus's
claim of Caesar's ambition; he shows Caesar's bloody, lifeless body to the
crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads
Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive 75 drachmas. Antony, even as he states his intentions against it,
rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome. Amid the violence, an
innocent poet, Cinna,
is confused with the conspirator Lucius Cinna and is taken by the mob, which
kills him for such "offenses" as his bad verses.
Brutus
next attacks Cassius for supposedly soiling the noble act of regicide by having accepted bribes. ("Did not great Julius
bleed for justice' sake? / What villain touch'd his body, that did stab, / And
not for justice?") The two are reconciled, especially after Brutus reveals
that his beloved wife
committed suicide under the stress of his absence from Rome; they prepare for a
civil war
against Mark Antony and Caesar's adopted son, Octavius, who have formed a triumvirate in Rome with Lepidus. That night, Caesar's ghost appears to Brutus with a
warning of defeat. (He informs Brutus, "Thou shalt see me at
Philippi.")
At
the battle,
Cassius and Brutus, knowing that they will probably both die, smile their last
smiles to each other and hold hands. During the battle, Cassius has his servant
kill him after hearing of the capture of his best friend, Titinius. After Titinius, who was not really captured, sees Cassius's
corpse, he commits suicide. However, Brutus wins that stage of the battle, but
his victory is not conclusive. With a heavy heart, Brutus battles again the
next day. He loses and commits suicide by running on his own sword, held for
him by a loyal soldier.
The
play ends with a tribute to Brutus by Antony, who proclaims that Brutus has
remained "the noblest Roman of them all" because he was the only
conspirator who acted, in his mind, for the good of Rome. There is then a small
hint at the friction between Mark Antony and Octavius which characterises
another of Shakespeare's Roman plays, Antony and Cleopatra.
Sources
Deviations from Plutarch
- Shakespeare makes Caesar's triumph take place on the day of Lupercalia (15 February) instead of six months earlier.
- For dramatic effect, he makes the Capitol the venue of Caesar's death rather than the Curia Pompeia (Curia of Pompey).
- Caesar's murder, the funeral, Antony's oration, the reading of the will and the arrival of Octavius all take place on the same day in the play. However, historically, the assassination took place on 15 March (The Ides of March), the will was published on 18 March, the funeral was on 20 March, and Octavius arrived only in May.
- Shakespeare makes the Triumvirs meet in Rome instead of near Bononia to avoid an additional locale.
- He combines the two Battles of Philippi although there was a 20-day interval between them.
- Shakespeare has Caesar say Et tu, Brute? ("And you, Brutus?") before he dies. Plutarch and Suetonius each report that he said nothing, with Plutarch adding that he pulled his toga over his head when he saw Brutus among the conspirators, though Suetonius does record other reports that Caesar said in Greek "καὶ σὺ, τέκνον;" (Kai su, teknon?, "And you, child?") The Latin words Et tu, Brute?, however, were not devised by Shakespeare for this play since they are attributed to Caesar in earlier Elizabethan works and had become conventional by 1599.
Shakespeare
deviated from these historical facts to curtail time and compress the facts so
that the play could be staged more easily. The tragic force is condensed into a
few scenes for heightened effect.
Date and text
Julius
Caesar was originally published in the First
Folio of 1623, but a performance was
mentioned by Thomas Platter the Younger in his diary in September 1599. The play is not mentioned
in the list of Shakespeare's plays published by Francis
Meres in 1598. Based on these two points,
as well as a number of contemporary allusions, and the belief that the play is
similar to Hamlet in vocabulary, and to Henry
V and As
You Like It in metre, scholars have suggested
1599 as a probable date.
The
text of Julius Caesar in the First
Folio is the only authoritative text for the play. The Folio text is notable for its
quality and consistency; scholars judge it to have been set into type from a
theatrical prompt-book.
The
play contains many anachronistic
elements from the Elizabethan era.
The characters mention objects such as doublets
(large, heavy jackets) – which did not exist in ancient Rome. Caesar is
mentioned to be wearing an Elizabethan doublet instead of a Roman toga. At one
point a clock is heard to strike and Brutus notes it with "Count the
clock".
Analysis and criticism
Historical background
Maria
Wyke has written that the play reflects the general anxiety of Elizabethan
England over succession of leadership. At the time of its creation and first
performance, Queen Elizabeth,
a strong ruler, was elderly and had refused to name a successor, leading to
worries that a civil war similar to that of Rome might break out after her
death.
Protagonist debate
Critics
of Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar differ greatly on their views of
Caesar and Brutus. Many have debated whether Caesar or Brutus is the
protagonist of the play, because of the title character's death in Act Three,
Scene One. But Caesar compares himself to the Northern
Star, and perhaps it would be foolish
not to consider him as the axial character of the play, around whom the entire
story turns. Intertwined in this debate is a smattering of philosophical and
psychological ideologies on republicanism and monarchism. One author, Robert C. Reynolds, devotes attention to the
names or epithets given to both Brutus and Caesar in his essay "Ironic
Epithet in Julius Caesar". This author points out that Casca praises
Brutus at face value, but then inadvertently compares him to a disreputable
joke of a man by calling him an alchemist, "Oh, he sits high in all the people's hearts,/And
that which would appear offence in us/ His countenance, like richest alchemy,/
Will change to virtue and to worthiness" (I.iii.158–160). Reynolds also talks
about Caesar and his "Colossus" epithet, which he points out has its
obvious connotations of power and manliness, but also lesser known connotations
of an outward glorious front and inward chaos.
Myron
Taylor, in his essay "Shakespeare's Julius Caesar and the Irony of
History", compares the logic and philosophies of Caesar and Brutus. Caesar
is deemed an intuitive philosopher who is always right when he goes with his
instinct, for instance when he says he fears Cassius as a threat to him before
he is killed, his intuition is correct. Brutus is portrayed as a man similar to
Caesar, but whose passions lead him to the wrong reasoning, which he realises
in the end when he says in V.v.50–51, "Caesar, now be still:/ I kill'd not
thee with half so good a will".
Joseph
W. Houppert acknowledges that some critics have tried to cast Caesar as the
protagonist, but that ultimately Brutus is the driving force in the play and is
therefore the tragic hero. Brutus attempts to put the republic over his
personal relationship with Caesar and kills him. Brutus makes the political
mistakes that bring down the republic that his ancestors created. He acts on
his passions, does not gather enough evidence to make reasonable decisions and
is manipulated by Cassius and the other conspirators.
Traditional
readings of the play may maintain that Cassius and the other conspirators are
motivated largely by envy
and ambition, whereas Brutus is motivated by the demands of honour and patriotism. Certainly, this is the view that Antony
expresses in the final scene. But one of the central strengths of the play is
that it resists categorising its characters as either simple heroes or
villains. The political journalist and classicist Garry Wills
maintains that "This play is distinctive because it has no villains".
It
is a drama famous for the difficulty of deciding which role to emphasise. The
characters rotate around each other like the plates of a Calder
mobile. Touch one and it affects the
position of all the others. Raise one, another sinks. But they keep coming back
into a precarious balance.
Wills'
contemporary interpretation leans more toward recognition of the conscious,
sub-conscious nature of human actions and interactions. In this, the role of
Cassius becomes paramount.
No comments:
Post a Comment